Thursday, February 12, 2015

Anwar victim of prejudiced mindset Federal Court Classic decision

Dr M credits Idioteque  Chinese for polls majority despite Anwar’s ‘black eye

A truth nobody will ever admit why mahatir incarcerated Anwar Does justice matter after 11 years why lingamgate was buried?

Anwar victim of prejudiced mindset Federal Court Classic decision  case of one law for Shafee Abdullah , another for the Anwar painful and sustained struggle for about 20 years or so. But if  he do not do this we will be cursed by our descendants for having betrayed the nation.

Wake up, Malaysia’s Bourbons Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, 

The lead prosecutor in the trial, who counts the prime minister and the governing party as clients in his private practice, was also at Mr. Najib’s home when the accuser visited.

Lawyer M. Visvanathan said the central issue in the case was why it took Saiful two days to lodge a report that he was sexually assaulted by Anwar.
He said the samples retrieved from Saiful was finally analysed by Dr Seah some 96 hours after the incident.
"The samples were not in sterile condition. It was taken from the anus which is rich in bacteria to break down organic matters like semen," said the lawyer, who had defended clients charged with sodomy and rape.
He described this piece of evidence in this case as "incredible and miraculous".
"I am no fan of Anwar but based on established legal principles and the evidence in this case, his legal team could convince the apex court to possibly get an acquittal.”
Visvanathan said the prosecution had to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, a higher standard placed on them."On the other hand, the defence was only required to cast a doubt in the prosecution's case to earn an acquittal," he added.He said the apex court judges had to decide whether the trial judge was right in accepting the opinions of the foreign experts or the appellate court's reliance on the evidence of the chemists.
How a young guy can be forced into sodomy by an old man readmorehttp://lawmattersjournalmalaysia.blogspot.com/2012/08/guilty-until-proven-innocentreversing.html
 At the High Court trial, the gel was produced and marked, says Gopal.
He says Saiful had testified that they did the act (sodomy) on the carpet and he applied the gel on his private part (anus).Gopal (right) shows a document not in the appeal records, and he says the 'keadaan barang kes' (list of items seized) does not included the KY jelly.
This, he says, shows the inconsistency in Saiful's testimony."Exhibit was not in the list and it should be considered inadmissible and its weightage (in consideration) is challenged."
A lower court had sentenced Mr. Anwar to five years in prison on the charge last year, and the rejection on Tuesday of his final appeal by the Federal Court effectively removed him as the linchpin of a fractious but ascendant opposition less than two years after the government was nearly toppled in a general election.

“This, to me, is a fabrication coming from a political conspiracy to stop my career,” Mr. Anwar said in the courtroom here in the country’s administrative capital after the court upheld his conviction.

He defiantly addressed the judges from the dock, calling them “partners in crime” and said, “You chose to remain on the dark side.”
“I pledge that I will not be silent!” Mr. Anwar thundered. “I will fight for freedom and justice. And I will never surrender!”

The judgment appeared to be the endgame of a 17-year power struggle between Mr. Anwar, 67, and the party that had once groomed him to be the country’s next leader. Mr. Anwar’s prosecutions since being kicked out of the United Malays National Organization in 1998 have been repeatedly condemned by human rights groups and Western governments as setbacks for democracy. They have also left Malaysia deeply polarized.Anwar told that he and his family had prepared themselves mentally and physically for the possibility of a second jail termThis treason of the highest order an unforgiveable betrayal of trust voters reposed in themThis has been morally degrading and has turned politics predatorySHAFEE FRAMED AND FABRICATED THE SODOMY1AND 2 NOW WANTS BE SODOMISED A LIABILITY TO NAJIB

TIM LESTER: So was Anwar’s trial fair? The damage from the trial goes beyond perceptions about Government influence over the judiciary to the police force.TIM LESTER: So was Anwar’s trial fair?

Yes, says Shafee Abdullah. But even he admits Malaysians don’t see it that way.readmoreCan the federal court judges, Malaysian judiciary prove that it is independent and had integrity?.

So what do you think Attorney General  is  made of? The zeal to help, to uplift the judiciary, to learn governance if they haven’t, and proclaim publicly that it is not for the lust of power? No it is for self-serving goals, loyalties for sheer benefit, clubbing on to an ideology so as to move down the dissenters. Do we play for the game, or do we play rather aggressively for our own innings?  Both, you may say, but if it comes to elimination of one of the two, self-serving goals are preferred, perhaps wiser.Democracy, in its conceptual principles gives one the right to choose, but disturbingly from the lot that is already chosen. Can’t say that money, muscle and manipulation do not go in all that, and putting it bluntly, why should one who has all this not use it for his purpose? The answer is that he probably would, if he found someone more deserving. No harm at all in believing we all are immortals, because when the inevitable happened, no one came back to say, just to say that it was indeed not so.What comes around goes around Best option is for him is to resign or sue Mat Zain

A truth nobody will ever admit why mahatir incarcerated Anwar Does justice matter after 11 years why lingamgate was buried?Mr. Anwar automatically lost his parliamentary seat on Tuesday as a result of the prison sentence and will be barred from running in elections for five years after his release.The date of the appeal hearings was initially scheduled for April last year. But it was moved up to March, days before Mr. Anwar was due to register for an election that could have put him in charge of the country’s richest state, Selangor, which is under opposition control. The sentence blocked Mr. Anwar from running in the election.This treason of the highest order an unforgiveable betrayal of trust voters reposed in themThis has been morally degrading and has turned politics predatorySHAFEE FRAMED AND FABRICATED THE SODOMY1AND 2 NOW WANTS BE SODOMISED A LIABILITY TO NAJIBTIM LESTER: So was Anwar’s trial fair? The damage from the trial goes beyond perceptions about Government influence over the judiciary to the police force.TIM LESTER: So was Anwar’s trial fair?Yes, says Shafee Abdullah. But even he admits Malaysians don’t see it that way.readmoreCan the federal court judges, Malaysian judiciary prove that it is independent and had integrity?.


Senior lawyer Muhammad Shafee Abdullah has taken to task foreign governments who criticised the Federal Court decision Tuesday which resulted in the conviction of opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim.The lead prosecutor in the trial, Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, who counts the prime minister and the governing party as clients in his private practice, was also at Mr. Najib’s home when the accuser visited.N. Surendran, a defense lawyer, argued in court during the appeal that the authorities had “a prearranged plan” to prosecute Mr. Anwar.The five-judge panel said on Tuesday that Mr. Anwar’s claim of a political conspiracy was a “mere allegation unsubstantiated by any credible evidence.”
No amount of affirmation by Putrajaya will boost the judiciary's image as an  independent body, lawyers said, pointing out that such confidence in the institution of justice must come from the public and litigants.
The lawyers, who were commenting on the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) swift statement in response to opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s guilty verdict on Tuesday, said it was unusual and unnecessary.
More so when the statement tried to defend the judiciary by saying that it is independent and that the judges "had reached their verdict only after considering the evidence in a balanced and objective manner."

Mr. Anwar was initially acquitted in 2012 by the Kuala Lumpur High Court, but prosecutors appealed, and Mr. Anwar was sentenced to five years in prison. Defense lawyers said the judgment was unusually swift. The sentence was delivered 90 minutes after lawyers had finished their submissions.The date of the appeal hearings was initially scheduled for April last year. But it was moved up to March, days before Mr. Anwar was due to register for an election that could have put him in charge of the country’s richest state, Selangor, which is under opposition control. The sentence blocked Mr. Anwar from running in the election.The date of the appeal hearings was initially scheduled for April last year. But it was moved up to March, days before Mr. Anwar was due to register for an election that could have put him in charge of the country’s richest state, Selangor, which is under opposition control. The sentence blocked Mr. Anwar from running in the election.
Former Prime Minister Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad has declared that I am not a communist but he called me an “authoritarian”.
I do not know whether I should thank Mahathir for clearing me of the “communist” charge which is still hurled against me by UMNO cybertroopers together with other lies and falsehoods like being the cause of May 13 race riots in 1969.
Mahathir wants probably to clear his name for he would look extremely foolish to have allowed a “communist” to operate freely in Parliament, having been Prime Minister for 22 years and Home Minister for nearly 15 years.
If I had been a “communist”, then Mahathir would be a failure as a Prime Minister and Home Minister not to know it.
I am intrigued by his accusation that I am an “authoritarian” and wants my son, Guan Eng, to replace me.
I would not accuse Mahathir of senility although he is capable of pretending to be senile and even pretend to suffer from amnesia, which was quite a show that he staged during his appearance at the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Lingam Videotapes, when he suffered from so many lapses of amnesia which had not been repeated.
In the footsteps of struggle, not riches like your sons
Mahathir said I want Guan Eng to replace me.
Was he referring to Guan Eng following my footsteps of being detained by him under the Internal Security Act (ISA), and subsequently “graduating” to be imprisoned in the Kajang Prison for 18 months and disqualified as MP and disenfranchisement of civil liberties like the right to vote and stand for elective office for five years when he championed the rights of a 15 year-old girl in Malacca?
Or was Mahathir referring to Guan Eng becoming Penang Chief Minister? May I remind Mahathir that I was never Penang Chief Minister?
Or was he referring to Guan Eng as DAP Secretary-General? Can I remind Mahathir that I ceased to be DAP Secretary-General in 1969 and Guan Eng became DAP Secretary-General in 2004.
Furthermore, Mahathir should be reminded he was responsible for the dragnet of mass arrests of ISA detention without trial, the infamous Operation Lalang, in October 1987; that he single-handed destroyed the independence, impartiality and professionalism not only of the judiciary, but also of other important national institutions like the police, the Elections Commission, the anti-corruption agency, and the civil service?
Rampant corrupt began during Dr M's charge
Need Mahathir to be reminded that it was under his premiership, that Malaysia began to suffer from rampant corruption in high political places and massive abuses of power by those in authority?
After the Federal Court’s shocking dismissal of Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s appeal and sent him back to prison for the third time on Tuesday, February 10, Mahathir blogged, quoting Hamlet, declaring that something is rotten in Malaysia.
Yes, something is rotten in Malaysia – as evidenced by a patriot like Anwar Ibrahim being sent to jail for the third time despite devoting 47 years of his life fighting for justice, freedom, human dignity and national unity.
If Malaysians are asked as to who are the top political leaders, past and present, who should be languishing in jail for five years, different names would be mentioned but Anwar Ibrahim would not be among them.
This shows the rot in Malaysia, but it is a rot which was started during Mahathir’s 22-year premiership, and by Mahathir himself!
Today, Mahathir is obsessed with the toppling of Najib as Prime Minister, but this is not because he wanted to stop the rot in Malaysia, to restore the independence and integrity of the judiciary and a just rule of law; to end the subversion of the independence and professionalism of national institutions whether the civil service, the police, the elections commission or anti-corruption agency; eradicate rampant corruption; restore ethics and honesty in public life; re-establish a good education system or restore Malaysia’s economic competitiveness.
Mahathir wants Najib out as the Prime Minister for Malaysia, not to stop the rot which was started by him during his premiership, but for an agenda personal to himself.
This is the rot of Hamlet in Malaysia!

No comments:

Post a Comment