‘Justice’ for Anina is just political farce
The morale of bureaucracy We can't expect anything else from a weak Govt riddled with scams & scandals! It's timeNajib and his gang resigns now, as each day brings more disrepute to them!
Judicial piracy, an UMNO'S conspiracyTengku Adnan challenge constitutionalism Anina in Wonderland UMNO politics ofTengku Adnan and Ab Rauf
the court heard the application by Tengku Adnan and Ab Rauf to strike out the suit filed by Anina last Aug 28 to challenge her termination as an Umno member.
Langkawi Wanita Umno member Anina Saadudin's membership in the party was automatically nullified when she filed a suit against the party, the High Court was today told.when proof appeared in the public domain through NOT a competent process.investigation before guilt was established before, through before investigation Our citizens constitute the most stringent judiciary in history. If Malaysian democracy is safe, it is because of the vigilance of Anina, not the outbursts of politicians.
Lawyer Mohd Hafarizam Harun said Anina had breached the party's constitution, and as an Umno member, Anina was bound by the party's rules and regulations.
The morality play, “innocent”. Let us examine this proposition. Why did if they were innocent? Why should anyone who is innocent be punished? That is utterly weak governance.
Ironically, Tengku Adnan did not see his Commitment to the Constitution Sadly, though understandably, this is the leadership did not see professes to offer to aspirational Malaysia, a leadership that bases its political arguments on outdated and long discarded colonial theories that were mainly meant to keep Malays and UMNO divided. But then the UMNO has always furthered its politics – post independence – based on divisiveness. consider changing its leader or try and educate the ones like Najib to a greater degree for the sake of a more genuine and balanced parliamentary approach. But perhaps that is too much to expect from a party which has, in any case, lost all ideological moorings and directions.
Anina was terminated from Umno after she filed the suit against Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak and Ab Rauf, among others, to reclaim a portion of the RM2.6 billion (US$650 million) donation that was allegedly deposited by the party president into his personal account in Singapore.
Lawyer Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla, acting for Anina, argued that thefirst defendant (Tengku Adnan) had failed to follow procedures in the Umno constitution in relation to two letters to remove the plaintiff from Umno.He said the issuance of both letters, dated Sept 1 and 2, to the media and public by Tengku Adnan, without initially conducting personal service to the plaintiff, was defective and illegal.Mohd Hafarizam fr argued that Anina could not use provisions in the federal constitution to challenge her sacking from Umno.how endangered the ConstitutionReturning to our point on the Constitution debate, it is too much to expect UMNO to seriously participate in a debate that reiterates UMNO’s commitment to the Constitution.