Mahathir’s Same shit well-intentioned laws, Judges plot to cripple the judiciary

relinquishing the reins, the former premier reminds those in power about their responsibility.

Attorney-general Abdul Gani Patail, who seems to enjoy the sort of power and the amorality to go with it that makes him a cross between longtime FBI director J Edgar Hoover and Stalin’s infamous prosecutor Andrey Vyshinsky, is shaping to crowd out a slew of judges who have placed trammels in his prosecutorial path.did compliment him for the fearless manner in which he takes on people and yet did clarify that I would prefer waiting for ‘proof’ before reaching hasty conclusions to open his victims mouth to administer Mahathir's poison  you can accuse anyone of murder, sodomy, infidelity, whatever that you believe in and this is why you can be a free bird on social platforms and spread your wings like an albatross. And for everything else there is a court. Precisely the reason why our Attorney-general Abdul Gani Patail is suffering from anxiety attacks and wants to cage birds with an enviable wingspan. If reports are to be believed, he wishes to even go to the rather alarming extent of ‘crushing’ them. Even more alarming are Abdul Gani Patail’s alleged intentions of ‘crushing’ the electronic media and/or social media. It speaks volumes of the levels of intolerance that the present Government currently has, especially when opinions are not in their favor. Of late, their stance against freedom of expression is hackneyed. The pattern of governance is eerily dictatorial. UMNO thought this nation belong to them only. They lie, rob, steal, jail and kill anyone at their own whims and fancies. This is insanity and this is Malaysia.

You should be afraid because this is the first time they won’t sell their votes to you for your money.

And seeing that your oldest, commonest and dirtiest trick ”Umno’s lethal weapon” 

Then-prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad instructed New Straits Times to “do away with” his former deputy Anwar Ibrahim following his sacking in 1998, said the daily’s former group editecting its own goons. Instead of justice and clean politics, we have rising criminalization and rising mud-slinging, without accountability for either the criminals or mud-slingers.Seen in this light, the rise of criminalized politics is not simply due to politicians becoming more crooked. It is also that endless judicial delays have created huge inducements for criminals to enter politics, and to succeed over law-abiding rivals. Many judges have condemned criminalized politics, amidst much public cheering, but need to acknowledge their own culpability in this mess.
We cannot truly reform politics until we reform the justice system. A land without justice in a reasonable period will necessarily be a land in which lawbreakers will beat law-abiders. This will be true not only in or-in-chief A Kadir Jasin.

“His (Mahathir’s) feeling was that we should try to do away with Anwar. Maybe we should try to erase the memory of Anwar,” Kadir said.

We cannot truly reform politics until we reform the justice system. A land without justice in a reasonable period will necessarily be a land in which lawbreakers will beat law-abiders. This will be true not only in politics but in business, the professions, and everything else

We ALL know Anwar is Innocent of what SAIFUL claimed. The case is so flawed that nothing holds. If the Court finds him guilty, ALL respect for the Judiciary System of this country will go down and ALL Judges will be dishonorable profession, despised by all. The Pinnacle of Law is corrupted forever, and every judge that walks the street will be spurn upon. Too bad. what a lot of people in the country might be thinking right now but can’t bring themselves to be upfront enough to put into so many words."Let's compromise on Judiciary for a stable UMNO" This is refreshing – and surprising – candour from UMNO  which in effect says that if stability of governance is to come at the cost of moral compromise, so be it – is a rare and honest response to Malaysia’s ingrained culture of bribery and graft. Corruption has become endemic to the country, as has the hypocrisy that accompanies it. All of us –from Elitist to common citizens – publicly denounce Judiciary corruption  in as the greatest besetting sin of our body politic, but privately we accept it as being part and parcel of our daily lives, almost as indispensable as the air we breathe and the food we eat. a tenure which witnessed rampant corruption matched with not just policy paralysis but policy retrogression in matters This is widely felt to be not just a desirable end, but the only end that matters. And the means of attaining that end like Judiciary with retrospective effect which scared off potential investors, both foreign and domestic – the country is in desperate need of not just political stability but also political efficacy. India wants not just a government that works, but also a government that will allow .citizens will endorse, if not explicitly then at least implicitly – don't matter very much at all.If morality is an obstacle to our achieving the necessary objective of having a stable, workable government then let’s dispense with morality, or at least dispense with the pretence that this commodity is capable of existing in our public life. – if ever there was such a creature – but only the politics of expediency.If everyone is more or less corrupt, corruption becomes a non-issue, as  Judges has pointed out. What’s important is 'good' — read 'effective' — governance.
It got under my skin. It disgusted me, to see how  Justice was being commercialized in Malaysia  After all, our judiciary is  in a hurry to convict anyone and when it does the right deal the Supreme Court is basically kind and considerate and adopts a humane approach towards the guilty as they too are human beings with human feelings and emotions and I really have no problem with that. In fact, it is indeed a laudable feature of our judiciary. Period. The question is, the UMNO's judges and  commercialization of Justice  spared not a thought for the families of their victims? These people too deserve the court’s mercy? They too have the right to breathe free, like you and me? Doesn’t crime deserve punishment? Doesn’t even God mete out reward and punishment according to our actions?
The controversial issue about the way judges were appointed and confirmed in their posts by other judges, with no reference to anyone else, including Parliament, had been simmering for a long time. Many felt that the system lacked transparency and accountability, virtually amounting to a legal version of an ‘old boy’ network, an elite circle of mutual back-scratchers who’ll promote each other’s interests, often at the expense of the public good.
Matters came to the fore after former Supreme Court judge Markandey Katju wrote two blogs for TOI in which he detailed the cases of several judges, who were widely known to be corrupt, who were kept on the bench thanks to successive CJIs ignoring complaints regarding them made by Katju.r.

A severe, trite, authentic case made by a journalist not just from your fraternity but from your office, the office that for over 12 years has been emblematic of unflinching, investigative journalism is mulled over at a pace that defies your very etymological origin  is this your way of acting correctly?Neither one of you has offered any rationale about why your office does not  examines cases  which is mandated by  Court judgment in correct correct correct  case. How have you acted correctly?Your statement – that you “need time prioritize it,” – does not even make sense – for prioritizing it would mean acting without lapse in time – self contradictory statements such as this have the media, and the ever watchful readership waiting in abeyance while you prioritize, or rather think about acting correctly!If you are, as you say, ‘driven by what she wants’ then how can you follow it up with a statement such as, “(he) stepped down. It was something had not asked for. It was much more than what she wanted.” How sardonically heroic for to give  so much more – a self-contrived temporary vacation to get away from the eye of the storm – for what he ‘in his correct senses’ deems as ‘drunken banter’ and a ‘lapse of judgment’ the Attorney General  should read and understand Article 145(3) of the Malaysian Constitution Unholy Trinity of Mahathir, the AG and the MACC  Attorney-General Abdul Gani Patail for malicious prosecution.