Saturday, February 14, 2015

The beheading of Najib's leverage' against Dr M,Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim on Final Judgment written by a Hindu convert to Islam


The Politics of Make Belief

Nurul Izzah says PM Najib offered her dad the post, if he walked away from Pakatan.so he was sent jail call upon Attorney-General Tan Sri Gani Patail to state if it is the new practice of his chambers to attack and criticize accused persons particularly after they have been convicted and are in prison serving sentence.

Does he prosecute, get them convicted, put handcuffs on them, send them to prison and then go on a public rampage against them without giving them any opportunity to defend themselves?
This is a very serious matter as the Attorney-General would to my mind, in those circumstances, be going way beyond what is required of him both in law and ethically as public prosecutor.
The Federal Constitution gives the Attorney-General powers to prosecute. It stops there.
I must as Member of Parliament condemn any conduct on part of the Attorney-General which is oppressive and amounts to an abuse of process and power. No one should ever take any pride in attacking another who cannot defend himself.


A brilliant AG we have here.
‘He does not have discretion to charge an offender under the wrong law.’Section 377C more serious than 377B, says AGAttorney-general (AG) Abdul Gani Patail’s deliberate misinterpretation of Section 377B in order to cover up his dereliction of duty to also charge Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan with sodomy must be condemned.Let me quote Section 377B of the Penal Code: “Whoever voluntarily commits carnal intercourse against the order of nature shall be punished...”. Is it not crystal clear that this section is designed to punish specifically those who have committed the act voluntarily?Since Saiful was adamant that he was sodomised without his consent, which essentially means that he was raped, why wasn’t Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim charged under Section 377C which was meant for such cases?Government Pre-Trial Maneuvers Show Political Motivations This trial is a bald-faced attempt to permanently remove an opposition leader from Malaysian politics. The government is trying to manipulate the justice system for political purposes. charge appears politically motivated and lacks credibility.The government has failed to disclose key evidence to the defense, hastily sought to pass a DNA statute that aids the prosecution, and put Anwar at a disadvantage by unnecessarily moving the trial to the high court. In addition, the government allowed the attorney general, who is under investigation for misconduct in Anwar’s previous trial, to be involved in the current case.

“This trial is a bald-faced attempt to permanently remove an opposition leader from Malaysian politics,” said Elaine Pearson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “The government is trying to manipulate the justice system for political purposes.”readmore The beheading of Najib's leverage' against Dr M,Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim on Final Judgment written by a Hindu convert to Islam

No comments:

Post a Comment